2018 Ford Taurus 2.0L EcoBoost Price and Reviews- The first Taurus blasted on the scene in the mid-1980s as Ford’s amount sedan, stunning the automobile world with an aero-focused design that sent competition scrambling and buyers storming into Blue Oval dealers. (It subsequently appeared on seven straight 10Best Vehicles lists. ) By 1992, the Taurus was the bestselling car in America, a title it kept through 1995. But mil novecentos e noventa e seis saw the Taurus trip through a controversial overhaul, and the badge faded for a spell in the mid-2000s before being resurrected on a bigger car–the Fusion had assimilated mid-sizer duties–when the 500 was renamed.
The latest Taurus has been around in its current form since the 2010 model yr, and that we generally like it, but every accolade we might dole out comes with a “but”–it’s an attractive car, but the rear seat is humorously cramped; it’s a comfortable cruiser, but its heave up and soft suspension preclude any athleticism. And one might say that the 2010-2012 Taurus’s naturally equiped 3. 5-liter V-6 experienced somewhat of your drinking problem, at least in line with the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY estimates of 18 miles per gallon city and 27 road.
EcoBoost, thank goodness! A thorough 2013 refresh performed find a 2. 0l turbocharged four-cylinder introduced to the lineup, bringing with it EPA marks of 22/32. That turns the Taurus into a veritable Texas tea-totaler, right? Very well, not exactly. The mid-cycle update didn’t trim much heft from the Taurus, partially a legacy of its safety-at-any-cost Volvo S80-based architecture. Even with the lighter 2. 0-liter turbocharged four in place of the 3. 5-liter V-6, our SEL test example still tipped the machines at 3933 pounds. (A Limited trim FWD V-6 we tested weighed 4068. )
The poundage makes itself most known during spirited drives, with systematic responses to steering advices and heavy doses of body pitch and throw. These tendencies are amplified in the 2. 0l car, where the planting season rates and damper configurations have been softened credited to the slighter lower curb weight. The Taurus does deliver a nice, plush ride over rugged pavement and on the freeway, the latter a place where the car is more at home anyway.
Another factor is that the car’s 6 spedd computerized largely operates at its own pace, declining to drop a cog or maybe more until the accelerator is pushed firmly against the carpet, even in Sport function. (And what pleasure is there for taking from personally executed shifts on a slow-responding, gear-selector-mounted rocker swap? ) Thus most of our time in Ford’s big sedan was spent in the boost and running after redline, simply to feel like i was getting anywhere. Doing so, normally, cancels out the Environment part of the engine’s equation–its raison d’? tre, given the similar output rankings to the V-6–and we saw just 18 mile per gallon in mixed driving. All of us have achieved 21 mile per gallon in a 4187-pound 4WD V-6 model, and twenty three mpg in the aforesaid front-drive Limited.