2018 Ford Taurus SEL AWD Price and Reviews- In spite of the Ford Taurus having once been the bestselling car in the U. S i9000. for a number of years, the current significant sedan, which was previous refreshed for 2013, has struggled up against the tide of newer, mid-size cars. See Ford selling more than five times as much Liquidation in the first one fourth of 2016. Although a redesign of the Taurus is due soon–provided Ford producer doesn’t kill it off entirely–the current model troops into 2016 with only modest updates to it is aging formula. For this final test of the current car, we revisited a front-wheel-drive model built in with the optional 2. 0-liter EcoBoost engine–very similar to a Taurus we tested in 2013.
The Taurus is comfortable, fairly handsome (if chunky-looking), and priced to get started on at less than 30 grand, but its weaknesses are typically a factor of the ancient Volvo-based platform on what it rides. At more than 200 inches long and 60 inches high, this Ford casts a huge shadow. Yet discover noticeably less room inside within other large cars, including the Chevrolet Impala and the Hyundai Azera. Also a few of the mid-size automobiles inside our last comparison test surpassed the Taurus’s home volume and rear-seat comfort. The largest return on the Ford’s size is it is cavernous, 20-cubic-foot trunk which capacious enough to consume a golf bag for every single of the car’s five occupants.
The two. 0l EcoBoost four-cylinder is a $995 option on fwd models and produces 240 horsepower and 270 lb-ft of torque. That’s some 48 fewer ponies than the standard V-6 yet 16 more lb-ft at a reduced engine speed. The downsized EcoBoost should in theory produce similar real-world performance as the six but with greater efficiency. This kind of Taurus, yet , gave up several tenths to V-6 cars both to 70 mph and through the quarter-mile. Our overall fuel-economy average of 23 mile per gallon matches the EPA’s mixed rating and was the highest we’ve recorded from a turbocharged Taurus, but we’ve had V-6 models return similar results.
Naturally, 7. 4 seconds to 60 mph and a quarter-mile run of 12-15. 6 at 91 with is enough quickness for day-to-day driving. But the 2. 0-liter always seems like it’s struggling up against the Taurus’s bulk. The slow six-speed computerized transmission will not help, with hesitant downshifts and little manual control from the clumsy shifter-mounted toggle switch (only the high-power SHO version of the Taurus gets exercise shifters).
What’s more, our test car’s engine started out to falter at the end of our assessment regimen: After performing fine through our passing checks and two successive full-throttle runs to 110 advise, the engine suddenly lost power. There were no warning lights or any unusual behavior from under the hood, simply a significant drop in forward drive, which we can only suspect was electronic- or temperature-related. More confusingly, all was back to normal after we parked the car overnight. Ford was unable to make contact with all of us with a diagnosis right now.